Premium
Long‐term variability of the terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks and the budgets of the carbon isotopes 13 C and 14 C
Author(s) -
Joos Fortunat,
Bruno Michele
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
global biogeochemical cycles
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.512
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1944-9224
pISSN - 0886-6236
DOI - 10.1029/98gb00746
Subject(s) - biosphere , radiocarbon dating , environmental science , carbon cycle , carbon sink , isotopes of carbon , atmospheric sciences , carbon fibers , sink (geography) , ice core , carbon 14 , climatology , geology , chemistry , climate change , environmental chemistry , physics , oceanography , total organic carbon , ecosystem , geography , ecology , materials science , composite number , composite material , cartography , astronomy , biology , paleontology , quantum mechanics
The long‐term variability in the terrestrial and oceanic uptake of anthropogenic carbon is investigated. Ice core and direct observations of atmospheric CO 2 and 13 C are used for the last 200 years. An inverse method called double deconvolution is applied. It is found that the biosphere turned from a carbon source of about 0.5 Gt C yr −1 into a sink of 1 Gt C yr −1 during the first half of this century. This is in qualitative agreement with earlier reconstructions based on atmospheric CO 2 data and implies a terrestrial sink to compensate land use emissions during the last five decades. Oceanic and biospheric carbon uptakes are estimated to be 0.9±1.0 and l.l±1.0 Gt C yr −1 as averaged over the 1970–1990 period. Hence ocean uptake is on the low side of current estimates, but our results may be biased as δ 13 C observations between 1956 and 1982 are missing. Additional uncertainties in calculated carbon sinks are due to uncertainties in model parameters and in fossil emission estimates. Prior to 1950, uncertainties are primarily related to uncertainties in the ice core δ 13 C data; a Monte Carlo analysis yields a l‐σ uncertainty in the terrestrial and oceanic uptake of ±0.36 Gt C yr −1 when ice core data are smoothed over a 50 year period. The budget of bomb‐produced radiocarbon is reinvestigated. We could not find model solutions that concomitantly match the bomb budget and the observed atmospheric δ 13 C and prebomb Δ 14 C decrease. The closure of the budget would require a relatively low oceanic and biospheric 14 C uptake that conflicts with the relatively high isotopic uptake rates required to simulate the observed decrease in δ 13 C and Δ 14 C. We conclude that recent estimates of bomb test productions and/or the stratospheric 14 C decrease are not compatible with published 13 C and 14 C observations.