
Why the United States is becoming more vulnerable to natural disasters
Author(s) -
Van Der Vink G.,
Allen R. M.,
Chapin J.,
Crooks M.,
Fraley W.,
Krantz J.,
Lavigne A. M.,
LeCuyer A.,
MacColl E. K.,
Morgan W. J.,
Ries B.,
Robinson E.,
Rodriguez K.,
Smith M.,
Sponberg K.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
eos, transactions american geophysical union
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 2324-9250
pISSN - 0096-3941
DOI - 10.1029/98eo00390
Subject(s) - natural disaster , natural hazard , metropolitan area , miami , geography , population , natural (archaeology) , meteorology , environmental science , demography , archaeology , sociology , soil science
The United States is becoming more vulnerable to natural hazards mostly because of changes in population and national wealth density—more people and more societal infrastructure have become concentrated in disaster‐prone areas. For most of the 20th century, the United States has been largely spared the expense of a catastrophic natural disaster. A great earthquake (magnitude 8 or larger) has not struck a major metropolitan area since the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. An extreme or catastrophic hurricane (Class 4 or 5) has not struck directly a major urban area since the one that hit Miami, Florida, in 1926. Yet even without such disasters, which might create losses well over $100 billion, the overall costs of natural hazards, such as extreme weather, drought, and wildfires, are estimated at $54 billion per year for the past 5 years, or approximately $1 billion per week [ National Science and Technology Council , 1997].