SO 2 ‐rock interaction on Io 2. Interaction with pure SO 2
Author(s) -
Burnett D. S.,
Goreva Julia,
Epstein S.,
Haldemann Susan L.,
Johnson Mary L.,
Rice Alan
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: planets
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/97je00718
Subject(s) - x ray photoelectron spectroscopy , disproportionation , silicate , chemical composition , sulfate , sulfur , scanning electron microscope , mineralogy , analytical chemistry (journal) , mineral , materials science , spectroscopy , chemistry , chemical engineering , metallurgy , catalysis , environmental chemistry , biochemistry , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , engineering , composite material
A Na‐S mineral on the surface of Io is required to be the source of the famous atomic cloud. SO 2 is a confirmed atmospheric and surface constituent, and because of the rapid volcanic resurfacing rate, the SO 2 is buried within the crust, where at least occasionally, over many cycles of burial and eruption, it must contact silicate materials at midlevel crustal temperatures. Surface interaction experiments were performed for a wide variety of silicate compositions showing that interaction products of these with SO 2 could be observed at 1123 K on laboratory timescales, even in the absence of external redox agents. Not all experiments produced deposits that could be studied by scanning electron microscopy; some required the greater sensitivity of photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Characterization of the alteration products by XPS showed that both oxidized and reduced sulfur species were formed, indicating that a disproportionation mechanism producing a sulfate and a reduced S species although smaller amounts of interaction leading to Na 2 SO 3 formation cannot be ruled out. The reduced sulfur species is best explained as elemental S which was independently documented for two compositions. Scanning electron microscopy studies for those compositions where reaction was extensive enough to be observed showed (1) Na 2 SO 4 for a soda‐lime composition, (2) a mixed Na‐Ca‐sulfate liquid and CaSO 4 for AbAnDi and a chondrule glass composition, and (3) Fe‐sulfate for a natural obsidian. Infrared spectroscopy for the soda‐lime glass composition showed peaks best explained by Na 2 SO 4 . We conclude that SO 2 disproportionation as well as direct formation from SO 3 under oxidizing conditions can produce Na 2 SO 4 by interaction of SO 2 with silicates on Io, but Ca and Fe sulfates may form preferentially in more basaltic compositions. As highly oxidizing conditions may be unlikely for Io, the disproportionation mechanism may be more competitive on Io than it is in laboratory experiments. Very low rates of Na 2 SO 4 production are required to supply the Io atomic cloud, so the interaction processes can be very inefficient.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom