z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Elevational changes in meteorological variables along a midlatitude glacier during summer
Author(s) -
Greuell Wouter,
Knap Wouter H.,
Smeets Paul C.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/97jd02083
Subject(s) - glacier , atmospheric sciences , geology , elevation (ballistics) , wind speed , albedo (alchemy) , altitude (triangle) , lapse rate , climatology , environmental science , geomorphology , physics , oceanography , geometry , art , mathematics , astronomy , performance art , art history
During the summer of 1994 a glaciometeorological experiment was carried out on the Pasterze (a glacier in Austria). This paper reports on the data from six energy‐balance stations ranging in altitude from 2075 to 3225 m above sea level (asl). The wind regime was dominated by the glacier wind. On the tongue, directional constancies ranged between 0.94 and 0.97. Mean 2 m wind speed and specifie humidity were almost constant along the glacier. The variation in the 2 m temperature along the glacier cannot be described by the usually assumed constant decrease with elevation. On the tongue the 2 m temperature even increased with elevation. A much better description of the temperature distribution is given by a linear relation between the potential temperature and the distance along the flow line. This can be understood from a simple thermodynamic analysis of the glacier‐wind layer. It is further shown that changes in clear‐sky global radiation with elevation are due mainly to changes in local albedo and relief and hardly at all to changes in absolute optical path length and atmospheric water vapor and aerosol content. On the tongue the laterally averaged ice albedo is almost constant with elevation. The flux of incoming long‐wave radiation during clear‐sky conditions at U2 (2310 m asl) was 48 W/m 2 higher than the flux at U5 (3225 m asl), on average. More than half of the difference was due to systematic differences in the shape of the temperature profile (probably the inversion depth is larger at U2). The rest can be ascribed to higher 2 m temperatures and larger amounts of upper hemisphere slopes at U2. The distributions of the meteorological variables and the parameterizations described in this paper might be incorporated in surface energy‐balance models designed to simulate the surface mass balance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here