Open AccessA comparative study of global ionospheric responses to intense magnetic storm conditions
Author(s) -
Szuszczewicz E. P.,
Lester M.,
Wilkinson P.,
Blanchard P.,
Abdu M.,
Hanbaba R.,
Igarashi K.,
Pulinets S.,
Reddy B. M.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/97ja01660
Subject(s) - storm , ionosphere , geomagnetic storm , atmospheric sciences , environmental science , northern hemisphere , climatology , thermosphere , latitude , physics , geology , meteorology , solar wind , geophysics , plasma , astronomy , quantum mechanics
We report on a study of three intense ionospheric storms that occurred in September 1989. Using Dst as a reference for storm onset and subsequent main and recovery phases, we analyze the observed worldwide responses of F region heights h m F 2 and densities N m F 2 as a function of universal and local times, latitudinal domains, and storm onset‐times; and we compare the characteristics of all three storms. The following points are among the major findings: (1) The negative phase storm was the dominant characteristic, with the greatest intensity occurring in the regions which were in the nighttime hemisphere during the main phase; (2) at middle and low latitudes negative phase characteristics were observed first in the nighttime hemisphere and then corotated with the Earth into the dayside; (3) the most intense negative response occurred in the recovery phase; (4) observations of the negative phase characteristics supported thermospheric upwelling, increased mean molecular mass, and an associated enhancement in dissociative recombination as the principal cause‐effect chain; but the observations suggest greater ion‐neutral chemistry effects than accounted for in current models; (5) h m F 2 was observed to respond quickly to the storm onset (pointing to the importance of electric fields) with enhanced values in all latitudinal and local time domains; (6) positive storm characteristics were among the issues most difficult to reconcile with current descriptions of cause‐effect relationships; and (7) the analysis of all storm phases and comparisons with several modeling efforts show that future advances in understanding require a more accurate accounting of the influences of magnetospherically‐imposed and dynamo‐driven electric fields, plasmaspheric fluxes, and vibrationally excited N 2 .