z-logo
Premium
On the role of hydrothermal systems in the transfer of volcanic sulfur to the atmosphere
Author(s) -
Oppenheimer Clive
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/96gl02061
Subject(s) - subaerial , hydrothermal circulation , geology , volcano , caldera , magma , volcanic gases , geochemistry , atmosphere (unit) , earth science , hydrothermal vent , impact crater , astrobiology , mineralogy , paleontology , physics , thermodynamics
The behaviour of magmatic volatiles dictates various aspects of a subaerial volcano's eruptive style, morphology, and potential impact on the atmosphere. Typically, when volatiles bleed from nonerupting magma bodies, they encounter superimposed hydrothermal envelopes. If their interaction with hydrothermal fluids is minimal, subaerial degassing may be important, and possibly manifested in high fluxes of gaseous SO 2 . By contrast, a “wet” volcano, in which there is substantial mixing of magmatic and hydrothermal fluids, scavenges reactive magmatic components: sulfur‐bearing minerals precipitate in crater lakes, in pore spaces created by hydrothermal dissolution of host rock, and in fractures formed by caldera collapse. Measurements of subaerial SO 2 fluxes (e.g., by Correlation Spectrometer, COSPEC) therefore say as much about hydrothermal vigour as they do about magma bodies. Major explosive eruptions necessarily entail reaming of conduits through volcanic edifices, and entrainment of hydrothermal sulfur. It is argued here that eruption clouds might thereby derive significant proportions of their SO 2 budget from combustion of native sulfur and/or sulfides sequestered by hydrothermal systems during inter‐eruptive periods of >10²–10³ yr.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here