Premium
Recent advances in watershed modelling
Author(s) -
Hornberger George M.,
Boyer Elizabeth W.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
reviews of geophysics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 8.087
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1944-9208
pISSN - 8755-1209
DOI - 10.1029/95rg00288
Subject(s) - watershed , hydrograph , snowmelt , flood myth , hydrology (agriculture) , storm , surface runoff , environmental science , computer science , meteorology , geology , geography , ecology , machine learning , geotechnical engineering , archaeology , biology
Creation of, application of, and animated discussion of mathematical models of watershed processes have been favorite pastimes of hydrologists for many decades. The original impetus for the development of watershed models was engineering design—the need to estimate properties of the hydrograph to be expected from a given sequence of storms. In recent years, die main driving force for development and refinement of watershed models has shifted. In addition to long‐standing issues such as flood forecasting, the hydrological community now is involved very much in interdisciplinary scientific issues. Some of these critical and emerging areas in hydrological science were summarized by a committee of the National Research Council ( NAS 1991; Eagleson 1991). Examples pertinent to watershed science include the need for improved understanding of: (1) how the flow of water through and storage of water within a catchment affects the chemical composition of water in streams, soils, and underlying rocks (e.g., see Turner et al . 1990); (2) how the biophysical mechanisms that determine evapotranspiration from catchments can be parameterized (e.g., Band 1993); and (3) how space and time scales are linked in processes that convert rainfall and snowmelt into runoff (e.g., Gupta et al . 1986). An ingredient common to these and other examples of “emerging areas” is that spatial and temporal variability in processes are of critical importance.