Premium
On Higher‐Order Corrections to the Flow Velocity Covariance Tensor
Author(s) -
Deng F. W.,
Cushman J. H.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/94wr02974
Subject(s) - covariance , covariance function , isotropy , mathematical analysis , mathematics , vector field , exponential function , field (mathematics) , tensor (intrinsic definition) , physics , statistical physics , statistics , geometry , optics , pure mathematics
Second‐order log fluctuating conductivity variance (σ ƒ 2 ) corrections to the head and velocity covariance functions are derived for a lognormal, stationary hydraulic conductivity field. The Fourier transform method proposed by Deng et al. (1993) is used extensively to obtain numerical estimates of these functions for an exponential log fluctuating conductivity covariance. It is shown that the velocity covariance is insensitive to second‐order corrections in the head field. The velocity covariance, on the other hand, is highly sensitive to second‐order corrections in the velocity when the log fluctuating conductivity variance approaches unity. A closed expression is derived for a second‐order correction to the velocity variance when there is no second‐order correction to the head field. The longitudinal second‐order correction to the velocity variance is 0.4σ ƒ 2 different from the first‐order approximation in isotropic media, 1.5σ ƒ 2 different in a highly stratified formation, and no different when the ratio of vertical to horizontal integral scales approaches infinity. The second‐order corrections to the horizontal and vertical transverse velocity variances are 2σ ƒ 2 different from the first‐order approximations for both isotropic and anisotropic systems.