z-logo
Premium
On the variability and use of the hydraulic conductivity alpha parameter in stochastic treatments of unsaturated flow
Author(s) -
White I.,
Sully M. J.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/91wr02198
Subject(s) - hydraulic conductivity , log normal distribution , exponential function , mathematics , conductivity , soil science , stochastic modelling , flow (mathematics) , porous medium , soil water , statistical physics , porosity , geotechnical engineering , mathematical analysis , environmental science , physics , statistics , geometry , geology , quantum mechanics
The quasi‐linear parameterization for unsaturated hydraulic conductivity K (Ψ) = K s exp (αΨ), where K is hydraulic conductivity, Ψ is soil water matric potential, K s is saturated hydraulic conductivity, and α is a porous material parameter, has been used in both stochastic and deterministic models of unsaturated water flow in porous materials. In the stochastic approach, K s is assumed lognormally distributed, but α and the volumetric soil water capacity C = d θ/ d Ψ, with θ volumetric soil water content, are assumed normally distributed. We point out here that α and K s are related to the same internal pore geometry of the soil. This interrelationship ensures that if K s is lognormal, then α, and possibly C , will also be lognormal. Additionally, we present preliminary field results which indicate that α is better described by a lognormal than a normal distribution. The quasi‐linear parameterization can be expected to be correct only in some integral sense. Predictions of increases in the variability of hydraulic conductivity with decreasing Ψ may therefore be prejudiced by the use of the exponential form for K (Ψ). Tests of the sensitivity of stochastic model predictions to both the parameterizations adopted for K (Ψ) and the assumed distribution functions of parameters seem warranted. Reliable experimental evidence on field variability of K (Ψ) and Ψ(θ) at substantial negative values of Ψ are also needed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here