Open AccessDevelopment and Implementation of a Physics‐Based Convective Mixing Scheme in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling Framework
Author(s) -
Pouyaei Arman,
Sadeghi Bavand,
Choi Yunsoo,
Jung Jia,
Souri Amir H.,
Zhao Chun,
Song Chul Han
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of advances in modeling earth systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.03
H-Index - 58
ISSN - 1942-2466
DOI - 10.1029/2021ms002475
Subject(s) - convection , parametrization (atmospheric modeling) , subsidence , atmospheric sciences , environmental science , deep convection , altitude (triangle) , entrainment (biomusicology) , mass flux , air quality index , troposphere , atmospheric convection , meteorology , flux (metallurgy) , climatology , mechanics , geology , physics , chemistry , radiative transfer , paleontology , geometry , mathematics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , structural basin , rhythm , acoustics
To improve the representation of convective mixing of atmospheric pollutants in the presence of clouds, we developed a convection module based on Kain and Fritsch (KF) method and implemented it in the Community Multiscale Air Quality model. The KF‐convection method is a mass‐flux‐based model that accounts for updraft flux, downdraft flux, entrainment, detrainment, and the subsidence effect. The method is consistent with the convection parametrization of the meteorology model. We apply the KF‐convection model to an idealized case and to a reference setup prepared for East Asia during the KORUS‐AQ campaign period to investigate its impact on carbon monoxide (CO) concentration at various atmospheric altitudes. We investigate the impact of KF‐convection on the horizontal distribution of CO concentrations by comparing it to aircraft measurements and the MOPITT CO column. We further discuss two types of impacts of KF‐convection: the direct impact caused by vertical movement of CO concentrations by updraft or downdraft and the indirect impact caused by transport of lifted CO concentrations to another region. May 12 saw a high indirect impact originating from the Shanghai region at higher altitudes and a high direct impact of updraft fluxes at 1 km altitude. However, May 26 revealed an immense updraft increasing higher altitude concentrations (up to 40 ppbv) and diverse indirect impacts over the region of the study (±50 ppbv). The overall comparison shows a strong connection between differences in the amount of concentration caused by the direct impact at each altitude with the presence of an updraft at that altitude. The developed model can be employed in large domains (i.e., East Asia, Europe, North America, and Northern Hemisphere) with sub‐grid scale cloud modeling to include the impacts of convection.