Premium
Superposed Epoch Analysis of Dispersionless Particle Injections Inside Geosynchronous Orbit
Author(s) -
Motoba T.,
Ohtani S.,
Gkioulidou M.,
Ukhorskiy A. Y.,
Lanzerotti L. J.,
Claudepierre S. G.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1029/2021ja029546
Subject(s) - geosynchronous orbit , physics , van allen probes , magnetosphere , van allen radiation belt , geophysics , local time , astrophysics , magnetic field , geodesy , geology , astronomy , satellite , mathematics , statistics , quantum mechanics
Dispersionless injections, involving sudden, simultaneous flux enhancements of energetic particles over some broad range of energy, are a characteristic signature of the particles that are experiencing a significant acceleration and/or rapid inward transport at the leading edge of injections. We have statistically analyzed data from Van Allen Probes (also known as Radiation Belt Storm Probes [RBSP]) to reveal where the proton (H + ) and electron (e – ) dispersionless injections occur preferentially inside geosynchronous orbit and how they develop depending on local magnetic field changes. By surveying measurements of RBSP during four tail seasons in 2012–2019, we have identified 171 dispersionless injection events. Most of the events, which are accompanied by local magnetic dipolarizations, occur in the dusk‐to‐midnight sector, regardless of particle species. Out of the selected 171 events, 75 events exhibit dispersionless injections of both H + and e – , which occur within 2 min of each other. With only three exceptions, the both‐species injection events are further divided into two main subgroups: One is the H + preceding e – events with a time offset of tens of seconds between H + and e – , and the other the concurrent H + and e – events without any time offset. Our superposed epoch results raise the intriguing possibility that the presence or absence of a pronounced negative dip in the local magnetic field ahead of the concurrent sharp dipolarization determines which of the two subgroups will occur. The difference between the two subgroups may be explained in terms of the dawn‐dusk asymmetry of localized diamagnetic perturbations ahead of a deeply penetrating dipolarization front.