Premium
Evaluating the deHoffmann‐Teller Cross‐Shock Potential at Real Collisionless Shocks
Author(s) -
Schwartz Steven J.,
Ergun Robert,
Kucharek Harald,
Wilson Lynn,
Chen LiJen,
Goodrich Katherine,
Turner Drew,
Gingell Imogen,
Madanian Hadi,
Gershman Daniel,
Strangeway Robert
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1029/2021ja029295
Subject(s) - physics , electric field , plasma , shock (circulatory) , electron , computational physics , heliosphere , ambipolar diffusion , magnetic field , shock wave , kinetic energy , statistical physics , solar wind , classical mechanics , mechanics , quantum mechanics , medicine
Shock waves are common in the heliosphere and beyond. The collisionless nature of most astrophysical plasmas allows for the energy processed by shocks to be partitioned amongst particle sub‐populations and electromagnetic fields via physical mechanisms that are not well understood. The electrostatic potential across such shocks is frame dependent. In a frame where the incident bulk velocity is parallel to the magnetic field, the deHoffmann‐Teller frame, the potential is linked directly to the ambipolar electric field established by the electron pressure gradient. Thus measuring and understanding this potential solves the electron partition problem, and gives insight into other competing shock processes. Integrating measured electric fields in space is problematic since the measurements can have offsets that change with plasma conditions. The offsets, once integrated, can be as large or larger than the shock potential. Here we exploit the high‐quality field and plasma measurements from NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale mission to attempt this calculation. We investigate recent adaptations of the deHoffmann‐Teller frame transformation to include time variability, and conclude that in practice these face difficulties inherent in the 3D time‐dependent nature of real shocks by comparison to 1D simulations. Potential estimates based on electron fluid and kinetic analyses provide the most robust measures of the deHoffmann‐Teller potential, but with some care direct integration of the electric fields can be made to agree. These results suggest that it will be difficult to independently assess the role of other processes, such as scattering by shock turbulence, in accounting for the electron heating.