Premium
Representation of Dropsonde‐Observed Atmospheric River Conditions in Reanalyses
Author(s) -
Cobb A.,
Delle Monache L.,
Can F.,
Ralph F. M.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2021gl093357
Subject(s) - environmental science , dropsonde , water vapor , meteorology , middle latitudes , climatology , atmospheric sciences , relative humidity , tropical cyclone , geology , geography
Abstract Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are the primary mechanism for mid‐latitude water vapor transport, and are identified by a key variable, integrated water vapor transport (IVT). The ability of atmospheric reanalyses in providing a ground‐truth dataset for the IVT field is assessed by comparing ERA5, MERRA‐2, and JRA‐55 data against a large sample (>1,700) of dropsonde profiles deployed in and around ARs. Bias and error increase with IVT magnitude, although asymmetrically around the AR core. A partitioning of the source of error reveals that humidity contributes more to the difference in IVT above 800 hPa, while wind is the dominant source in the lowest levels (to 950 hPa). This quantification of reanalysis error and bias identifies ERA5 as the dataset with the lowest IVT errors and demonstrates remaining challenges in representing the observed state in ARs.