Premium
Using Remote Sensing Data‐Based Hydrological Model Calibrations for Predicting Runoff in Ungauged or Poorly Gauged Catchments
Author(s) -
Huang Qi,
Qin Guanghua,
Zhang Yongqiang,
Tang Qiuhong,
Liu Changming,
Xia Jun,
Chiew Francis H. S.,
Post David
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/2020wr028205
Subject(s) - environmental science , streamflow , surface runoff , calibration , evapotranspiration , hydrology (agriculture) , remote sensing , drainage basin , geology , geography , cartography , statistics , ecology , mathematics , geotechnical engineering , biology
Because remote sensing (RS) data are spatially and temporally explicit and available across the globe, they have the potential to be used for predicting runoff in ungauged catchments and poorly gauged regions, a challenging area of research in hydrology. There is potential to use remotely sensed data for calibrating hydrological models in regions with limited streamflow gauges. This study conducts a comprehensive investigation on how to incorporate gridded remotely sensed evapotranspiration (AET) and water storage data for constraining hydrological model calibration in order to predict daily and monthly runoff in 30 catchments in the Yalong River basin in China. To this end, seven RS data calibration schemes are explored and compared to direct calibration against observed runoff and traditional regionalization using spatial proximity to predict runoff in ungauged catchments. The results show that using bias‐corrected remotely sensed AET (bias‐corrected PML‐AET data) for constraining model calibration performs much better than using the raw remotely sensed AET data (nonbias‐corrected AET obtained from PML model estimate). Using the bias‐corrected PML‐AET data in a gridded way is much better than using lumped data and outperforms the traditional regionalization approach especially in headwater and large catchments. Combining the bias‐corrected PML‐AET and GRACE water storage data performs similarly to using the bias‐corrected PML‐AET data only. This study demonstrates that there is great potential in using bias‐corrected RS‐AET data to calibrating hydrological models (without the need for gauged streamflow data) to estimate daily and monthly runoff time series in ungauged catchments and sparsely gauged regions.