z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Spatial Covariance Modeling for Stochastic Subgrid‐Scale Parameterizations Using Dynamic Mode Decomposition
Author(s) -
Gugole Federica,
Franzke Christian L. E.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of advances in modeling earth systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.03
H-Index - 58
ISSN - 1942-2466
DOI - 10.1029/2020ms002115
Subject(s) - covariance , empirical orthogonal functions , dynamic mode decomposition , covariance function , noise (video) , stochastic modelling , computer science , scale (ratio) , a priori and a posteriori , sensitivity (control systems) , statistical physics , mathematics , statistics , physics , philosophy , epistemology , quantum mechanics , machine learning , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , electronic engineering , engineering
Stochastic parameterizations are increasingly being used in climate modeling to represent subgrid‐scale processes. While different parameterizations are being developed considering different aspects of the physical phenomena, less attention is given to technical and numerical aspects. In particular, empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) are employed when a spatial structure is required. Here, we provide evidence they might not be the most suitable choice. By applying an energy‐consistent parameterization to the two‐layer quasi‐geostrophic (QG) model, we investigate the model sensitivity to a priori assumptions made on the parameterization. In particular, we consider here two methods to prescribe the spatial covariance of the noise: first, by using climatological variability patterns provided by EOFs, and second, by using time‐varying dynamics‐adapted Koopman modes, approximated by dynamic mode decomposition (DMD). The performance of the two methods are analyzed through numerical simulations of the stochastic system on a coarse spatial resolution and the outcomes compared to a high‐resolution simulation of the original deterministic system. The comparison reveals that the DMD‐based noise covariance scheme outperforms the EOF‐based one. The use of EOFs leads to a significant increase of the ensemble spread and to a meridional misplacement of the bimodal eddy kinetic energy (EKE) distribution. Conversely, using DMDs, the ensemble spread is confined, the meridional propagation of the zonal jet stream is accurately captured, and the total variance of the system is improved. Our results highlight the importance of the systematic design of stochastic parameterizations with dynamically adapted spatial correlations, rather than relying on statistical spatial patterns.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here