z-logo
Premium
Impacts of Drying and Rewetting on the Radiocarbon Signature of Respired CO 2 and Implications for Incubating Archived Soils
Author(s) -
BeemMiller Jeffrey,
Schrumpf Marion,
Hoyt Alison M.,
Guggenberger Georg,
Trumbore Susan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: biogeosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8961
pISSN - 2169-8953
DOI - 10.1029/2020jg006119
Subject(s) - soil water , radiocarbon dating , grassland , environmental science , environmental chemistry , carbon cycle , soil respiration , chemistry , carbon dioxide , soil carbon , carbon fibers , soil science , ecology , ecosystem , geology , biology , paleontology , organic chemistry , materials science , composite number , composite material
The radiocarbon signature of respired CO 2 (∆ 14 C‐CO 2 ) measured in laboratory soil incubations integrates contributions from soil carbon pools with a wide range of ages, making it a powerful model constraint. Incubating archived soils enriched by “bomb‐C” from mid‐20th century nuclear weapons testing would be even more powerful as it would enable us to trace this pulse over time. However, air‐drying and subsequent rewetting of archived soils, as well as storage duration, may alter the relative contribution to respiration from soil carbon pools with different cycling rates. We designed three experiments to assess air‐drying and rewetting effects on ∆ 14 C‐CO 2 with constant storage duration (Experiment 1), without storage (Experiment 2), and with variable storage duration (Experiment 3). We found that air‐drying and rewetting led to small but significant ( α  < 0.05) shifts in ∆ 14 C‐CO 2 relative to undried controls in all experiments, with grassland soils responding more strongly than forest soils. Storage duration (4–14 y) did not have a substantial effect. Mean differences (95% CIs) for experiments 1, 2, and 3 were: 23.3‰ (±6.6), 19.6‰ (±10.3), and 29.3‰ (±29.1) for grassland soils, versus −11.6‰ (±4.1), 12.7‰ (±8.5), and −24.2‰ (±13.2) for forest soils. Our results indicate that air‐drying and rewetting soils mobilizes a slightly older pool of carbon that would otherwise be inaccessible to microbes, an effect that persists throughout the incubation. However, as the bias in ∆ 14 C‐CO 2 from air‐drying and rewetting is small, measuring ∆ 14 C‐CO 2 in incubations of archived soils appears to be a promising technique for constraining soil carbon models.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here