Premium
Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Fluxes From Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments in a High‐Altitude Tropical Catchment
Author(s) -
Schneider Chloe L.,
Herrera Maribel,
Raisle Megan L.,
Murray Andrew R.,
Whitmore Keridwen M.,
Encalada Andrea C.,
Suárez Esteban,
RiverosIregui Diego A.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: biogeosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8961
pISSN - 2169-8953
DOI - 10.1029/2020jg005844
Subject(s) - environmental science , atmosphere (unit) , terrestrial ecosystem , altitude (triangle) , atmospheric sciences , hydrology (agriculture) , ecosystem , carbon cycle , carbon dioxide , drainage basin , ecology , geology , geography , geometry , mathematics , geotechnical engineering , cartography , meteorology , biology
High‐altitude tropical grasslands, known as “páramos,” are characterized by high solar radiation, high precipitation, and low temperature. They also exhibit some of the highest ecosystem carbon stocks per unit area on Earth. Recent observations have shown that páramos may be a net source of CO 2 to the atmosphere as a result of climate change; however, little is known about the source of this excess CO 2 in these mountainous environments or which landscape components contribute the most CO 2 . We evaluated the spatial and temporal variability of surface CO 2 fluxes to the atmosphere from adjacent terrestrial and aquatic environments in a high‐altitude catchment of Ecuador, based on a suite of field measurements performed during the wet season. Our findings revealed the importance of hydrologic dynamics in regulating the magnitude and likely fate of dissolved carbon in the stream. While headwater catchments are known to contribute disproportionately larger amounts of carbon to the atmosphere than their downstream counterparts, our study highlights the spatial heterogeneity of CO 2 fluxes within and between aquatic and terrestrial landscape elements in headwater catchments of complex topography. Our findings revealed that CO 2 evasion from stream surfaces was up to an order of magnitude greater than soil CO 2 efflux from the adjacent terrestrial environment. Stream carbon flux to the atmosphere appeared to be transport limited (i.e., controlled by flow characteristics, turbulent flow, and water velocity) in the upper reaches of the stream, and source limited (i.e., controlled by CO 2 and carbon availability) in the lower reaches of the stream. A 4‐m waterfall along the channel accounted for up to 35% of the total evasion observed along a 250‐m stream reach. These findings represent a first step in understanding ecosystem carbon cycling at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in high‐altitude, tropical, headwater catchments.