z-logo
Premium
Modeling Lunar Pyroclasts to Probe the Volatile Content of the Lunar Interior
Author(s) -
Florez Darien,
Huber Christian,
Milliken Ralph E.,
Berkson Julia
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: planets
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9100
pISSN - 2169-9097
DOI - 10.1029/2020je006645
Subject(s) - pyroclastic rock , markov chain monte carlo , geology , inversion (geology) , polar , astrobiology , monte carlo method , volcano , physics , geochemistry , astronomy , seismology , mathematics , statistics , tectonics
Constraining the volatile budget of the lunar interior has important ramifications for models of Moon formation. While many early and previous measurements of samples acquired from the Luna and Apollo missions suggested the lunar interior is depleted in highly volatile elements like H, a number of high‐precision analytical studies over the past decade have argued that it may be more enriched in water than previously thought. Here, we integrate recent remotely sensed near‐infrared reflectance measurements of small Dark‐Mantle‐Deposits (DMDs) Birt E and Grimaldi, interpreted to represent pyroclastic deposits, and physics‐based eruption models to better constrain the preeruptive water content of the magmas that resulted in these deposits. We model the trajectory and water loss of pyroclasts from eruption to deposition, coupling eruption dynamics with a volatile diffusion model for each pyroclast. Modeled pyroclast sizes and final water contents are then used to predict spectral reflectance properties for comparison with the observed orbital near‐infrared data. We develop an inversion scheme based on the Markov‐Chain Monte‐Carlo (MCMC) method to retrieve constraints between governing parameters such as the initial volatile content of the melt and the pyroclast size distribution (which influences the remotely measured water absorption strengths). The MCMC inversion allows us to estimate the primordial (preeruption) water content for different DMDs and therefore explore whether their source is volatile‐rich. Our results suggest that the preeruptive water content of the magmas sampled by Birt E and Grimaldi can be constrained within a range 400–800 ppm, while the pyroclast size in diameter corresponding to the 50th percentile of a given deposit likely ranges from ∼400 to 600 μm in diameter. Finally, we determine the evaporation and cooling rates are likely low, ∼10 −6  m/s and 6°C/s, respectively.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here