z-logo
Premium
Regional and Urban Column CO Trends and Anomalies as Observed by MOPITT Over 16 Years
Author(s) -
Hedelius Jacob K.,
Toon Geoffrey C.,
Buchholz Rebecca R.,
Iraci Laura T.,
Podolske James R.,
Roehl Coleen M.,
Wennberg Paul O.,
Worden Helen M.,
Wunch Debra
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1029/2020jd033967
Subject(s) - troposphere , boreal , environmental science , sciamachy , climatology , physical geography , satellite , geography , atmospheric sciences , meteorology , geology , archaeology , aerospace engineering , engineering
Atmospheric carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations have decreased since the beginning of the century, and the rate of decrease depends on the region. Depending on how regions are chosen, their boundaries may not always align with where there are differences in trends. To address this, we calculate trends within 0.4° × 0.4° grid cells independently throughout the globe using satellite CO retrievals from the Measurements Of Pollution In The Troposphere (MOPITT) satellite instrument from 2002 to 2017. These trends are found with the caveat that there are large singular biomass burning events somewhere nearly every year, and we include examples of large column CO anomalies during sporadic but large burning events in the North American and Eurasian boreal forests, the Amazon, Africa, and Indonesia. CO trends behave similarly within regions that span about a few thousand kilometers. Using TransCom region definitions, we find average trends between −0.9 and 0.1 ppb year −1 (about −0.9 to 0.1% year −1 ) for 2002–2017. Over 5‐year subsets, trends in TransCom regions vary between −3.6 and 1.8 ppb year −1 . This substantial spatial and temporal variability in trends is in agreement with other studies. With an understanding of regional trends, we compare with trends from urban areas. Generally, CO trends within urban areas are indistinguishable from regional trends. This may be because of a combination of noise in the data, the large footprint for MOPITT, or because anthropogenic CO reduction measures were implemented before the MOPITT record began. We provide case studies for a few cities, such as Los Angeles, and find long‐term variation in the rate of change of column CO.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here