Premium
Scaling Seismic Fault Thickness From the Laboratory to the Field
Author(s) -
Ferrand Thomas P.,
Nielsen Stefan,
Labrousse Loïc,
Schubnel Alexandre
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1029/2020jb020694
Subject(s) - scaling , shearing (physics) , slip (aerodynamics) , materials science , mechanics , geology , shear (geology) , thermal , composite material , geometry , thermodynamics , physics , mathematics
Pseudotachylytes originate from the solidification of frictional melt, which transiently forms and lubricates the fault plane during an earthquake. Here, we observe how the pseudotachylyte thickness a scales with the relative displacement D both at the laboratory and field scales, for measured slip varying from microns to meters, over 6 orders of magnitude. Considering all the data jointly, a bend appears in the scaling relationship when slip and thickness reach ∼1 mm and 100 µm, respectively, i.e., M W > 1. This bend can be attributed to the melt thickness reaching a steady‐state value due to melting dynamics under shear heating, as is suggested by the solution of a Stefan problem with a migrating boundary. Each increment of fault is heating up due to fast shearing near the rupture tip and starting cooling by thermal diffusion upon rupture. The building and sustainability of a connected melt layer depend on this energy balance. For plurimillimetric thicknesses ( a > 1 mm), melt thickness growth reflects in first approximation the rate of shear heating which appears to decay in D −1/2 to D −1 , likely due to melt lubrication controlled by melt + solid suspension viscosity and mobility. The pseudotachylyte thickness scales with moment M 0 and magnitude M W ; therefore, thickness alone may be used to estimate magnitude on fossil faults in the field in the absence of displacement markers within a reasonable error margin.