Premium
Seismicity and Stress Associated With a Fluid‐Driven Fracture: Estimating the Evolving Geometry
Author(s) -
Vasco D. W.,
Smith J. Torquil,
Hoversten G. Michael
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1029/2020jb020190
Subject(s) - induced seismicity , poromechanics , geology , fracture (geology) , fluid dynamics , stress (linguistics) , mechanics , pore water pressure , geotechnical engineering , stress field , seismology , structural engineering , physics , porous medium , porosity , engineering , linguistics , philosophy , finite element method
Abstract A coupled approach, combining the theory of rate‐ and state‐dependent friction and methods from poroelasticity, forms the basis for a quantitative relationship between displacements and fluid leak‐off from a growing fracture and changes in the rate of seismic events in the region surrounding the fracture. Poroelastic Green's functions link fracture aperture changes and fluid flow from the fracture to changes in the stress field and pore pressure in the adjacent formation. The theory of rate‐ and state‐dependent friction provides a connection between Coulomb stress changes and variations in the rate of seismic events. Numerical modeling indicates that the Coulomb stress changes can vary significantly between formations with differing properties. The relationship between the seismicity rate changes and the changes in the formation stresses and fluid pressure is nonlinear, but a transformation produces a quantity that is linearly related to the aperture changes and fluid leak‐off from the fracture. The methodology provides a means for mapping changes in seismicity into fracture aperture changes and to image an evolving fracture. An application to observed microseismicity associated with a hydrofracture reveals asymmetric fracture propagation within two main zones, with extended propagation in the upper zone. The time‐varying volume of the fracture agrees with the injected volume, given by the integration of rate changes at the injection well, providing validation of the estimated aperture changes.