Premium
Evaluating Processing Choices for the Geodetic Estimation of Earth Orientation Parameters With Numerical Models of Global Geophysical Fluids
Author(s) -
Dill R.,
Dobslaw H.,
Hellmers H.,
Kehm A.,
Bloßfeld M.,
Thomas M.,
Seitz F.,
Thaller D.,
Hugentobler U.,
Schönemann E.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1029/2020jb020025
Subject(s) - gnss applications , geodetic datum , very long baseline interferometry , geodesy , earth's rotation , polar motion , earth observation , computer science , data processing , remote sensing , algorithm , satellite , geography , global positioning system , telecommunications , engineering , aerospace engineering , database
Different Earth orientation parameter (EOP) time series are publicly available that typically arise from the combination of individual space geodetic technique solutions. The applied processing strategies and choices lead to systematically differing signal and noise characteristics particularly at the shortest periods between 2 and 8 days. We investigate the consequences of typical choices by introducing new experimental EOP solutions obtained from combinations at either normal equation level processed by Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut at the Technical University of Munich (DGFI‐TUM) and Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (BKG), or observation level processed by European Space Agency (ESA). All those experiments contribute to an effort initiated by ESA to develop an independent capacity for routine EOP processing and prediction in Europe. Results are benchmarked against geophysical model‐based effective angular momentum functions processed by Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences (ESMGFZ). We find, that a multitechnique combination at normal equation level that explicitly aligns a priori station coordinates to the ITRF2014 frequently outperforms the current International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) standard solution 14C04. A multi‐Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)‐only solution already provides very competitive accuracies for the equatorial components. Quite similar results are also obtained from a short combination at observation level experiment using multi‐GNSS solutions and SLR from Sentinel‐3A and Sentinel‐3B to realize space links. For Δ UT1, however, very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) information is known to be critically important so that experiments combining only GNSS and possibly SLR at observation level perform worse than combinations of all techniques at normal equation level. The low noise floor and smooth spectra obtained from the multi‐GNSS solution nevertheless illustrates the potential of this most rigorous combination approach so that further efforts to include in particular VLBI are strongly recommended.