Premium
Explicit Global Simulation of Gravity Waves in the Thermosphere
Author(s) -
Becker Erich,
Vadas Sharon L.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1029/2020ja028034
Subject(s) - thermosphere , gravity wave , atmospheric sciences , ionosphere , geology , physics , geophysics , gravitational wave , climatology , astrophysics
Abstract We present a new version of the high‐resolution Kühlungsborn Mechanistic general Circulation Model (KMCM) extended to z ∼ 450 km. This model is called HIAMCM (HI Altitude Mechanistic general Circulation Model) and explicitly simulates gravity waves (GWs) down to horizontal wavelengths of λ h ∼ 165 km. We find predominant tertiary GWs in the winter thermosphere at middle/high latitudes. These GWs typically have horizontal wavelengths λ h ∼ 300 –1,100 km, ground‐based periods ∼ 25–90 min, and intrinsic horizontal phase speeds c I h ∼ 250 –350 m s −1 . Above z ∼ 200 km, the predominant GW horizontal propagation directions are roughly against the background winds from the diurnal tide; the GWs propagate mainly poleward at midnight, eastward at 6 local time (LT), equatorward at noon, and westward at 18 LT. Wintertime GWs at z ∼ 300 km having 165 km ≤ λ h ≤ 330 km create a large hot spot over the Southern Andes/Antarctic Peninsula that agrees well with quiet time satellite measurements. Due to cancelation effects, the time‐averaged zonal mean Eliassen‐Palm flux divergence from the resolved GWs in the thermosphere is negligible compared to that of the tides and compared to the zonal component of the time‐averaged zonal mean ion drag. We also find that the thermospheric GWs dissipate mainly from macroturbulent diffusion and, above z ∼ 200 km, from molecular diffusion, whereas the tides dissipate mainly from ion drag. The averaged dissipative heating in the thermosphere due to tides is much stronger than that due to GWs.