z-logo
Premium
Particulate Backscattering in the Global Ocean: A Comparison of Independent Assessments
Author(s) -
Bisson K. M.,
Boss E.,
Werdell P. J.,
Ibrahim A.,
Behrenfeld M. J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2020gl090909
Subject(s) - lidar , argo , ocean color , seawifs , environmental science , remote sensing , satellite , decorrelation , la niña , climatology , oceanography , geology , phytoplankton , physics , chemistry , organic chemistry , nutrient , el niño southern oscillation , algorithm , astronomy , computer science
How well do we know the particulate backscattering coefficient (b bp ) in the global ocean? Satellite lidar b bp has never been validated globally and few studies have compared lidar b bp to b bp derived from reflectances (via ocean color) or in situ observations. Here, we validate lidar b bp with autonomous biogeochemical Argo floats using a decorrelation analysis to identify relevant spatiotemporal matchup scales inspired by geographical variability in the Rossby radius of deformation. We compare lidar, float, and ocean color b bp at the same locations and times to assess performance. Lidar b bp outperforms ocean color, with a median percent error of 18% compared to 24% in the best case and a relative bias of −11% compared to −21%, respectively. Phytoplankton carbon calculated from ocean color and lidar exhibits basin‐scale differences that can reach ±50%.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom