
Implementation of U.K. Earth System Models for CMIP6
Author(s) -
Sellar Alistair A.,
Walton Jeremy,
Jones Colin G.,
Wood Richard,
Abraham Nathan Luke,
Andrejczuk Miroslaw,
Andrews Martin B.,
Andrews Timothy,
Archibald Alex T.,
Mora Lee,
Dyson Harold,
Elkington Mark,
Ellis Richard,
Florek Piotr,
Good Peter,
Gohar Laila,
Haddad Stephen,
Hardiman Steven C.,
Hogan Emma,
Iwi Alan,
Jones Christopher D.,
Johnson Ben,
Kelley Douglas I.,
Kettleborough Jamie,
Knight Jeff R.,
Köhler Marcus O.,
Kuhlbrodt Till,
Liddicoat Spencer,
LinovaPavlova Irina,
Mizielinski Matthew S.,
Morgenstern Olaf,
Mulcahy Jane,
Neininger Erica,
O'Connor Fiona M.,
Petrie Ruth,
Ridley Jeff,
Rioual JeanChristophe,
Roberts Malcolm,
Robertson Eddy,
Rumbold Steven,
Seddon Jon,
Shepherd Harry,
Shim Sungbo,
Stephens Ag,
Teixiera Joao C.,
Tang Yongming,
Williams Jonny,
Wiltshire Andy,
Griffiths Paul T.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of advances in modeling earth systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.03
H-Index - 58
ISSN - 1942-2466
DOI - 10.1029/2019ms001946
Subject(s) - earth system science , climate model , forcing (mathematics) , computer science , environmental science , tropopause , meteorology , climate change , climatology , stratosphere , geology , oceanography , physics
We describe the scientific and technical implementation of two models for a core set of experiments contributing to the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The models used are the physical atmosphere‐land‐ocean‐sea ice model HadGEM3‐GC3.1 and the Earth system model UKESM1 which adds a carbon‐nitrogen cycle and atmospheric chemistry to HadGEM3‐GC3.1. The model results are constrained by the external boundary conditions (forcing data) and initial conditions. We outline the scientific rationale and assumptions made in specifying these. Notable details of the implementation include an ozone redistribution scheme for prescribed ozone simulations (HadGEM3‐GC3.1) to avoid inconsistencies with the model's thermal tropopause, and land use change in dynamic vegetation simulations (UKESM1) whose influence will be subject to potential biases in the simulation of background natural vegetation. We discuss the implications of these decisions for interpretation of the simulation results. These simulations are expensive in terms of human and CPU resources and will underpin many further experiments; we describe some of the technical steps taken to ensure their scientific robustness and reproducibility.