Premium
Floodplain Wetland Channel Planform, Cross‐Sectional Morphology, and Sediment Characteristics Along an Estuarine to Tidal River Gradient
Author(s) -
Diefenderfer Heida L.,
Borde Amy B.,
Cullinan Valerie I.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: earth surface
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9011
pISSN - 2169-9003
DOI - 10.1029/2019jf005391
Subject(s) - estuary , hydrology (agriculture) , wetland , marsh , tidal irrigation , geology , fluvial , channel (broadcasting) , sediment , floodplain , tidal range , overbank , salt marsh , tidal river , environmental science , oceanography , geomorphology , ecology , geotechnical engineering , engineering , structural basin , biology , electrical engineering
The formation of wetland channel networks on coastal river floodplains is affected by spatial transitions in tidal‐fluvial processes. This study evaluated sedimentation patterns in tidal marshes on the 147‐km tidal Columbia River and its 87‐km estuary and characterized the cross‐sectional geometry and planform morphometry of tidal wetlands along the estuarine to riverine gradient. Tidal marshes were predominantly depositional (median 0.7 cm yr −1 , primarily silt), consistent with late‐Holocene rates. Marsh sediment accretion rate increased with annual maximum 7‐day average daily maximum water depth. Elevation was negatively correlated with accretion rate in the tidal river and positively correlated with total organic carbon (TOC%) in the tidal river and estuary. TOC% was greater in the estuary and, like percent fines, greater farther from the main‐channel Columbia River. For four single‐channel and six channel‐network planforms of tidal marsh, shrub‐dominated, and forested wetlands: (1) Spatial patterns of cross‐sectional morphology conformed to typical coastal wetland morphology in estuarine reaches up to the tidal river. (2) Reach‐based and common slope linear models for channel perimeter on wetland area were predictive in the estuary ( R 2 > 0.81) and differed between island ( n = 144) and mainland ( n = 164) wetlands. No planform linear models were predictive for the entire study area or the tidal river. No models for channel outlets were acceptable. (3) Channel perimeter, surface area, and outlets were all highly variable within and among estuarine–riverine reaches. Analyses of sediment, cross‐section, and planform support the use of a “natural network paradigm” for wetland‐restoration design on tidal river floodplains.