Premium
Understanding Terrestrial Water Storage Declining Trends in the Yellow River Basin
Author(s) -
Jing Wenlong,
Yao Ling,
Zhao Xiaodan,
Zhang Pengyan,
Liu Yangxiaoyue,
Xia Xiaolin,
Song Jia,
Yang Ji,
Li Yong,
Zhou Chenghu
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1029/2019jd031432
Subject(s) - environmental science , drainage basin , structural basin , climate change , water storage , hydrology (agriculture) , water resources , midstream , water resource management , physical geography , climatology , geography , geology , oceanography , ecology , environmental engineering , paleontology , cartography , geotechnical engineering , petroleum industry , inlet , biology
Under dual impacts from climate change and human activities, the Yellow River Basin (YRB) of China suffers from droughts and water scarcity. Understanding variations of terrestrial water storage (TWS) over the YRB is significant and beneficial to regional water resources management and sustainable development. This study investigates TWS variations in the YRB using data sets from two solutions (RL05 and RL06) of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites, as well as from global land surface models (the NOAH model and Catchment Land Surface Model [CLSM]) and hydrology and water resources model (PCR‐GLOBWB). Annual terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSA) variation patterns were tracked by introducing a weighed centroid analysis concept. Human water use was analyzed, and its importance to TWS changes was evaluated by using the random forest algorithm. Conclusions can be briefly summarized as follows: (1) The declining trend of TWS in the YRB from the RL06 solution is more negative than that from RL05; the TWS trend from the PCR‐GLOBWB model is more consistent with GRACE than with the NOAH model and CLSM at the basin level, and the three models all underestimate the declining trend of TWS in the midstream relative to the GRACE solutions. (2) Spatial weighed centroids of annual GRACE TWSA moved toward the headwater of the YRB during the 2003–2015 period, suggesting a wide gap of TWS between the upstream and downstream YRB; the TWSA time series well correlate with the long‐term accumulation of climatic water balance, but the connections became weak in the 2010–2015 period. (3) Groundwater withdrawals have been controlled according to the Water Resources Bulletin, but the stress may be partly shifted to surface water; the increasing trend of ecological and industrial surface water use is significant, following the agriculture water use. (4) For the entire YRB, groundwater use accounts for the majority of feature importance in modeling TWSA time series, and the contribution of climate factors is the least. Agricultural water use ranks first relative to other sectors for the YRB, followed by the ecological and industrial use. This study provides a first comparison of TWSA between the latest Center for Space Research (CSR) GRACE RL06 solution and the previous RL05 solution in the YRB. The results are expected to present a comprehensive picture of TWS variations in the YRB and the impacts from climate and human factors.