Premium
Insignificant QBO‐MJO Prediction Skill Relationship in the SubX and S2S Subseasonal Reforecasts
Author(s) -
Kim Hyemi,
Richter Jadwiga H.,
Martin Zane
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1029/2019jd031416
Subject(s) - madden–julian oscillation , quasi biennial oscillation , climatology , environmental science , oscillation (cell signaling) , forecast skill , troposphere , meteorology , atmospheric sciences , geology , geography , convection , chemistry , biochemistry
The impact of the stratospheric quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) on the prediction of the tropospheric Madden‐Julian oscillation (MJO) is evaluated in reforecasts from nine models participating in subseasonal prediction projects, including the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) and Subseasonal to Seasonal (S2S) projects. When MJO prediction skill is analyzed for December to February, MJO prediction skill is higher in the easterly phase of the QBO than the westerly phase, consistent with previous studies. However, the relationship between QBO phase and MJO prediction skill is not statistically significant for most models. This insignificant QBO‐MJO skill relationship is further confirmed by comparing two subseasonal reforecast experiments with the Community Earth System Model v1 using both a high‐top (46‐level) and low‐top (30‐level) version of the Community Atmosphere Model v5. While there are clear differences in the forecasted QBO between the two model top configurations, a negligible change is shown in the MJO prediction, indicating that the QBO in this model may not directly control the MJO prediction and supporting the insignificant QBO‐MJO skill relationship found in SubX and S2S models.