Premium
Seasonal Characteristics of Model Uncertainties From Biogenic Fluxes, Transport, and Large‐Scale Boundary Inflow in Atmospheric CO 2 Simulations Over North America
Author(s) -
Feng Sha,
Lauvaux Thomas,
Davis Kenneth J.,
Keller Klaus,
Zhou Yu,
Williams Christopher,
Schuh Andrew E.,
Liu Junjie,
Baker Ian
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1029/2019jd031165
Subject(s) - environmental science , biosphere , atmospheric sciences , boundary layer , inflow , sink (geography) , planetary boundary layer , climatology , chemical transport model , meteorology , troposphere , geology , geography , mechanics , physics , cartography , astronomy
Regional estimates of biogenic carbon fluxes over North America from both atmospheric inversions (“top‐down” approach) and terrestrial biosphere models (“bottom‐up”) remain highly uncertain. We merge these approaches with an ensemble‐based, regional modeling system able to diagnose and quantify the causes of uncertainties in top‐down atmospheric estimates of the terrestrial sink over North America. Our ensemble approach quantifies and partitions the uncertainty stemming from atmospheric transport, the biosphere, and large‐scale CO 2 boundary inflow (boundary conditions). We use meteorological data, CO 2 fluxes, and CO 2 mole fraction measurements to assure the reliability of the ensemble system. Our results show that all uncertainty components have clear seasonal variations. The biogenic flux component dominates modeled boundary layer CO 2 uncertainty, ranging from 2.5 ppm in summer and winter to 1.5 ppm in fall and spring. Spatially, it remains highly uncertain in the U.S. Corn Belt regions. Transport uncertainty reaches a maximum of 2.5 ppm in the summer months and stays at 1.2 ppm for the rest of the year and is highly correlated with the biogenic CO 2 fluxes. Boundary conditions play the smallest role in atmospheric boundary layer CO 2 uncertainty with a magnitude smaller than 1 ppm. However, boundary conditions are the most important uncertainty component in column‐averaged CO 2 (XCO 2 ). The spatiotemporal variations of the uncertainties in modeled XCO 2 are similar to those in atmospheric boundary layer CO 2 .