Premium
Local‐Time Variabilities of March Equinox Daytime SABER CO 2 in the Upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere Region
Author(s) -
Salinas Cornelius Csar Jude H.,
Chang Loren C.,
Liang MaoChang,
Yue Jia,
Qian Liying,
Gan Quan,
Chiu YiChung,
Russell James,
Mlynczak Martin
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1029/2019ja027039
Subject(s) - thermosphere , mesosphere , daytime , atmospheric sciences , atmosphere (unit) , solstice , mesopause , environmental science , latitude , equinox , atmospheric tide , ionosphere , climatology , local time , physics , geology , meteorology , stratosphere , geophysics , astronomy , statistics , mathematics
This work reports the analysis of the local‐time variations of daytime CO 2 in the Upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere region as observed by the Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) instrument onboard the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics satellite. Results show that daytime SABER CO 2 in the upper mesosphere between latitudes 30°S and 50°N is lower in the morning than in the afternoon. The same was found in the lower thermosphere but between latitudes 50°S and 50°N. The opposite was found in the upper mesosphere between 50°S and 30°S. These results are compared to simulations of CO 2 by the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model–eXtended. It was found that the local‐time variations of Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model–eXtended CO 2 are weaker than SABER CO 2 . Model diagnostics indicated that these local‐time variations in the model are driven primarily (secondarily) by strong vertical (meridional) gradients in Upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere CO 2 volume mixing ratios and strong local‐time variations in vertical (meridional) winds. This work concludes that SABER CO 2 shows significant local‐time variations that are not well simulated by Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model–eXtended, and we suggest that this is likely because of weaker tidal forcing in the model.