z-logo
Premium
Hydrodynamic Controls on Primary Producer Communities in Spring‐Fed Rivers
Author(s) -
Reaver N. G. F.,
Kaplan D. A.,
Mattson R. A.,
Carter E.,
Sucsy P. V.,
Frazer T. K.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2019gl082571
Subject(s) - periphyton , vascular plant , spring (device) , environmental science , benthic zone , ecosystem , algae , primary producers , ecology , nutrient , abundance (ecology) , flow velocity , hydrology (agriculture) , flow (mathematics) , biology , geology , physics , phytoplankton , geotechnical engineering , species richness , mechanics , thermodynamics
In many spring‐fed rivers, benthic macroalgae and periphytic algae are increasing and, in some cases, replacing rooted vascular plants, which are critical to ecosystem function. While most research has focused on the role of nutrients in driving this change, in‐channel hydrodynamics also control vascular plant and algal abundances and their interactions. Understanding relationships between hydrology and primary producers is essential for developing ecologically relevant flow regulations. We investigated the relationship between flow velocity and primary producer abundance in spring‐fed rivers using observational data from 16 springs to determine critical velocity thresholds for periphyton, macroalgae, and vascular plants. We also used flow suppression experiments to quantify periphyton growth rates and test for hysteretic behavior. Results suggest a critical velocity of 0.22 m/s (95% CI: 0.13–0.28 m/s) for periphyton but no specific thresholds for macroalgae or vascular plants. Experimental and theoretical results supported these findings and suggest periphyton establishment is not hysteretic.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here