Premium
Farmer and Farmland Owner Views on Spatial Targeting for Soil Conservation and Water Quality
Author(s) -
Zimmerman E. K.,
Tyndall J. C.,
Schulte L. A.,
Larsen G. L. D.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/2018wr023230
Subject(s) - business , incentive , context (archaeology) , agriculture , environmental resource management , constraint (computer aided design) , resource (disambiguation) , government (linguistics) , best practice , environmental economics , soil conservation , production (economics) , environmental planning , natural resource economics , economics , geography , engineering , computer science , mechanical engineering , computer network , linguistics , management , macroeconomics , microeconomics , philosophy , archaeology
The U.S. Corn Belt is highly productive with respect to grain and livestock commodities but often neglects to deliver other benefits such as soil stability, nutrient retention, and clean water. New precision technologies and conservation planning frameworks offer opportunities to adapt the current agricultural system to meet environmental goals along with production by strategically placing best management practices (BMPs) to target and address specific in‐field resource concerns. To understand farmers' and farmland owners' willingness to participate in such targeting schemes, we conducted in‐depth interviews with 18 farmers and farmland owners whose fields were targeted for soil and nutrient loss in two watersheds in central Iowa. We examined their current application of BMPs and opportunities and constraints to further adoption. We found that farmers and farmland owners often recognized the importance of producing a diverse suite of on‐ and off‐farm environmental benefits but lacked the context, information, certainty, and strong incentives to manage for them. Interviewees were generally receptive to using technologies to target BMPs to areas with resource concerns but expressed concerns about applications on their own land. They specifically perceived challenges related to cost, management complexity, coordination with government programs, and loss of autonomy. For broad acceptance, a spatially targeted conservation approach would need to be paired with expanded partnerships, trusted technical service, and adaptation incentives to reduce farm‐level economic trade‐offs.