A Total Energy Error Analysis of Dynamical Cores and Physics‐Dynamics Coupling in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM)
Author(s) -
Lauritzen Peter H.,
Williamson David L.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of advances in modeling earth systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.03
H-Index - 58
ISSN - 1942-2466
DOI - 10.1029/2018ms001549
Subject(s) - spurious relationship , coupling (piping) , atmosphere (unit) , physics , climate model , statistical physics , core model , geophysical fluid dynamics , core (optical fiber) , meteorology , computational physics , computer science , climate change , geology , mechanical engineering , mathematics , mathematical analysis , oceanography , optics , machine learning , engineering
A closed total energy (TE) budget is of utmost importance in coupled climate system modeling; in particular, the dynamical core or physics‐dynamics coupling should ideally not lead to spurious TE sources/sinks. To assess this in a global climate model, a detailed analysis of the spurious sources/sinks of TE in National Center for Atmospheric Research's Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) is given. This includes spurious sources/sinks associated with the parameterization suite, the dynamical core, TE definition discrepancies, and physics‐dynamics coupling. The latter leads to a detailed discussion of the pros and cons of various physics‐dynamics coupling methods commonly used in climate/weather modeling.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom