Premium
Structural Control on Downdip Locking Extent of the Himalayan Megathrust
Author(s) -
Lindsey Eric O.,
Almeida Rafael,
Mallick Rishav,
Hubbard Judith,
Bradley Kyle,
Tsang Louisa L. H.,
Liu Yixiang,
Burgmann Roland,
Hill Emma M.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1029/2018jb015868
Subject(s) - geology , geodetic datum , seismology , fault (geology) , transect , coupling (piping) , moment (physics) , levelling , thrust fault , thrust , subduction , boundary (topology) , geodesy , tectonics , mechanical engineering , mathematical analysis , oceanography , physics , mathematics , classical mechanics , engineering , thermodynamics
Geologic reconstructions of the Main Himalayan Thrust in Nepal show a laterally extensive midcrustal ramp, hypothesized to form the downdip boundary of interseismic locking. Using a recent compilation of interseismic GPS velocities and a simplified model of fault coupling, we estimate the width of coupling across Nepal using a series of two‐dimensional transects. We find that the downdip width of fault coupling increases smoothly from 70 to 90 km in eastern Nepal to 100–110 km in central Nepal, then narrows again in western Nepal. The inferred coupling transition is closely aligned with geologic reconstructions of the base of the midcrustal ramp in central and eastern Nepal, but in western Nepal, the data suggest that the location is intermediate between two proposed ramp locations. The result for western Nepal implies either an anomalous coupling transition that occurs along a shallowly dipping portion of the fault or that both ramps may be partially coupled and that a proposed crustal‐scale duplexing process may be active during the interseismic period. We also find that the models require a convergence rate of 15.5 ± 2 mm/year throughout Nepal, reducing the geodetic moment accumulation rate by up to 30% compared with earlier models, partially resolving an inferred discrepancy between geodetic and paleoseismic estimates of moment release across the Himalaya.