z-logo
Premium
How Accurately Should We Model Ice Shelf Melt Rates?
Author(s) -
Goldberg D. N.,
Gourmelen N.,
Kimura S.,
Millan R.,
Snow K.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2018gl080383
Subject(s) - ice shelf , geology , bathymetry , ice sheet , antarctic ice sheet , ice stream , altimeter , climatology , lead (geology) , sea ice , oceanography , cryosphere , geodesy , geomorphology
Assessment of ocean‐forced ice sheet loss requires that ocean models be able to represent sub‐ice shelf melt rates. However, spatial accuracy of modeled melt is not well investigated, and neither is the level of accuracy required to assess ice sheet loss. Focusing on a fast‐thinning region of West Antarctica, we calculate spatially resolved ice‐shelf melt from satellite altimetry and compare against results from an ocean model with varying representations of cavity geometry and ocean physics. Then, we use an ice‐flow model to assess the impact of the results on grounded ice. We find that a number of factors influence model‐data agreement of melt rates, with bathymetry being the leading factor; but this agreement is only important in isolated regions under the ice shelves, such as shear margins and grounding lines. To improve ice sheet forecasts, both modeling and observations of ice‐ocean interactions must be improved in these critical regions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here