Premium
A Comparison of Model‐Based Ionospheric and Ocean Tidal Magnetic Signals With Observatory Data
Author(s) -
Schnepf N. R.,
Nair M.,
Maute A.,
Pedatella N. M.,
Kuvshinov A.,
Richmond A. D.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2018gl078487
Subject(s) - ionosphere , earth's magnetic field , geophysics , amplitude , geology , geodesy , magnetic field , physics , atmospheric sciences , quantum mechanics
Observed tidal geomagnetic field variations are due to a combination of electric currents in the ionosphere, ocean, and their induced counterparts. Using these variations to constrain subsurface electrical conductivity in oceanic regions is a promising frontier; however, properly separating the ionospheric and oceanic tidal contributions of the magnetic field is critical for this. We compare semidiurnal lunar tidal magnetic signals (i.e., the signals due to the M 2 tidal mode) estimated from 64 global observatories to physics‐based forward models of the ionospheric M 2 magnetic field and the oceanic M 2 magnetic field. At ground level, predicted ionospheric M 2 amplitudes are strongest in the horizontal components, whereas the predicted oceanic amplitudes are strongest in the vertical direction. There is good agreement between the predicted and estimated M 2 phases for the Y component; however, the F and X components experience deviations that may be indicative of unmodeled ionospheric processes or unmodeled coastal effects. Overall, we find that the agreement between the physics‐based model predictions and the observations is very encouraging for electromagnetic sensing applications, especially since the predicted ionospheric vertical component is very weak.