Premium
The Impact and Solar Wind Proxy of the 2017 September ICME Event at Mars
Author(s) -
Ma Yingjuan,
Fang Xiaohua,
Halekas Jasper S.,
Xu Shaosui,
Russell Christopher T.,
Luhmann Janet G.,
Nagy Andrew F.,
Toth Gabor,
Lee Christina O.,
Dong Chuanfei,
Espley Jared R.,
McFadden James P.,
Mitchell David L.,
Jakosky Bruce M.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2018gl077707
Subject(s) - solar wind , mars exploration program , martian , coronal mass ejection , magnetosheath , interplanetary spaceflight , physics , magnetopause , atmosphere of mars , environmental science , atmospheric sciences , geophysics , astrobiology , plasma , quantum mechanics
We study a large interplanetary coronal mass ejection event impacting Mars in mid‐September 2017 numerically. During this time period, MAVEN remained inside the Martian bow shock and therefore could not measure the solar wind directly. We first simulate the event using three steady state cases with estimated solar wind conditions and find that these cases were able to reproduce the general features observed by MAVEN. However, these time‐stationary runs cannot capture the response of the system to large variations in the solar wind associated with the event. To address this problem, we derive a solar wind proxy based on MAVEN observations in the sheath region and their comparison with steady state magnetohydrodynamic model results. The derived solar wind proxy is then used to drive a time‐dependent magnetohydrodynamic model, and we find that the data‐model comparison is greatly improved, especially in the magnetosheath. We are able to reproduce some detailed structures observed by MAVEN during the period, despite the lack of a direct measurement of the solar wind, indicating that the derived solar wind conditions are reliable. Finally, we examine in detail the impact of the event on the Martian system: including variations of the three typical plasma boundaries and the ion loss rates. Our results show that these plasma boundary locations varied drastically during the event, and the total ion loss rate was enhanced by more than an order of magnitude.