Open AccessAn Instrument Anomaly in the Mars Exploration Rover Pancam 1,009‐nm Filter (R7): Characterization, Simulation, Correction, and Preliminary Verification
Author(s) -
Jakobsen Simone J.,
Kinch Kjartan M.,
Madsen Morten Bo,
Bell James F.,
Wellington Danika,
Dajose Lorinda,
Alizai Khaled
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
earth and space science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.843
H-Index - 23
ISSN - 2333-5084
DOI - 10.1029/2018ea000473
Subject(s) - mars exploration program , calibration , optics , filter (signal processing) , pixel , remote sensing , spectrometer , physics , martian , wavelength , artifact (error) , charge coupled device , imaging spectrometer , mars rover , contrast (vision) , geology , computer science , artificial intelligence , computer vision , astronomy , quantum mechanics
During pre‐flight calibration of the panoramic camera (Pancam) instrument on board the Mars Exploration Rovers MER A (Spirit) and MER B (Opportunity), a discrepancy was noted between 11‐band spectra extracted from Pancam images of the camera's radiometric calibration target and reflectance spectra obtained with a spectrometer. This discrepancy was observed in the longest‐wavelength filter of the camera (the longpass R7 filter with system λ eff = 1,009 nm) and consisted of a reduction in contrast between bright and dark regions. Here we describe and characterize this effect. We propose that the effect arises because long‐wavelength photons close to the silicon band‐gap at 1,100 nm are allowed through the R7 filter, pass through the bulk charge‐coupled device, scatter from the backside, pass through the charge‐coupled device again, and are registered in a pixel other than the pixel through which they originally entered. Based on this hypothesis we develop a model capable of accurately simulating the effect, and correct for it. We present preliminary results from testing this correction on preflight, as well as in‐flight, images. The effect is small, but in some specific cases in small regions of high contrast, the effect is significant. In in‐flight images of Martian terrain we observed the signal in dark shadows to be artificially inflated by up to ∼ 33% and analysis of early‐mission calibration target images indicated that the reduced contrast due to the artifact is equivalent to >100 DN (full well = 4095 DN) for a hypothetical perfectly dark pixel.