Premium
Transdimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography
Author(s) -
Galetti E.,
Curtis A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1029/2017jb015418
Subject(s) - nonlinear system , inverse problem , parameterized complexity , tomography , synthetic data , tomographic reconstruction , monte carlo method , computation , eikonal equation , algorithm , electrical resistivity tomography , statistical physics , mathematics , computer science , mathematical analysis , electrical resistivity and conductivity , physics , optics , statistics , quantum mechanics
Abstract This paper shows that imaging the interior of solid bodies with fully nonlinear physics can be highly beneficial compared to imaging with the equivalent linearized tomographic methods and that this is true for a variety of different types of physics. Including full nonlinearity provides interpretable uncertainties and far greater depth of image penetration into unknown targets such as the Earth's subsurface. We use an adaptively parameterized Monte Carlo method to invert electrical resistivity data for the conductivity structure of the Earth and demonstrate the method on two field data sets. Key results include the observation of directly interpretable uncertainty loops which define possible geometrical variations in the edges of isolated anomalies, hence quantifying the spatial resolution of these boundaries. These topologies of uncertainties are similar to those observed when performing fully nonlinear seismic traveltime tomography. This shows that loop‐like uncertainty topologies are expected in the solutions to a wide variety of tomographic problems, using a variety of data types and hence laws of physics (here the Laplace equation; in previous work the Eikonal or ray equations). We also show that the depth to which we can construct a tomographic image using electrical data is extended by up to a factor of 8 using nonlinear methods compared to linearized inversion using common standard linearized programs. These advantages come at the cost of significantly increased computation. All of these results are illustrated on both synthetic and real data examples.