z-logo
Premium
Temporal moments revisited: Why there is no better way for physically based model reduction in time
Author(s) -
Leube P. C.,
Nowak W.,
Schneider G.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/2012wr011973
Subject(s) - reduction (mathematics) , monomial , ordinary differential equation , space time , ode , state space , transient (computer programming) , mathematics , spacetime , computer science , nonlinear system , base (topology) , mathematical optimization , differential equation , mathematical analysis , physics , statistics , geometry , engineering , discrete mathematics , quantum mechanics , chemical engineering , operating system
Many hydro(geo)logical problems are highly complex in space and time, coupled with scale issues, variability, and uncertainty. Especially time‐dependent models often consume enormous computational resources, but model reduction techniques can alleviate this problem. Temporal moments (TM) offer an approach to reduce the time demands of transient hydro(geo)logical simulations. TM reduce transient governing equations to steady state and directly simulate the temporal characteristics of the system, if the equations are linear and coefficients are time independent. This is achieved by an integral transform, projecting the dynamic system response onto monomials in time. In comparison to classical approaches of model reduction that involve orthogonal base functions, however, the monomials for TM are nonorthogonal, which might impair the quality and efficiency of model reduction. Thus, we raise the question of whether there are more suitable temporal base functions than the monomials that lead to TM. In this work, we will derive theoretically that there is only a limited class of temporal base functions that can reduce hydro(geo)logical models. By comparing those to TM we conclude that, in terms of gained efficiency versus maintained accuracy, TM are the best possible choice. While our theoretical results hold for all systems of linear partial or ordinary differential equations (PDEs, ODEs) with any order of space and time derivatives, we illustrate our study with an example of pumping tests in a confined aquifer. For that case, we demonstrate that two (four) TM are sufficient to represent more than 80% (90%) of the dynamic behavior, and that the information content strictly increases with increasing TM order.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here