Open AccessLunar floor‐fractured craters: Classification, distribution, origin and implications for magmatism and shallow crustal structure
Author(s) -
Jozwiak Lauren M.,
Head James W.,
Zuber Maria T.,
Smith David E.,
Neumann Gregory A.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: planets
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2012je004134
Subject(s) - geology , impact crater , sill , mass wasting , magmatism , geology of the moon , population , gravity anomaly , petrology , geomorphology , seismology , basalt , paleontology , astrobiology , tectonics , landslide , physics , demography , sociology , oil field
Floor‐Fractured Craters (FFCs) are a class of lunar craters characterized by anomalously shallow floors cut by radial, concentric, and/or polygonal fractures; additional interior features are moats, ridges, and patches of mare material. Two formation mechanisms have been hypothesized—floor uplift in response to shallow magmatic intrusion and sill formation, and floor shallowing in response to thermally driven viscous relaxation. This study combines new Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) and Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) data to characterize and categorize the population of FFCs and map their distribution on the Moon, and uses variations in floor‐fractured crater morphology and regional distribution to investigate the proposed formation mechanisms. The population of FFCs was categorized according to the classes outlined by Schultz (1976). The distribution of these FFC categories shows an evolution of crater morphology from areas adjacent to lunar impact basins to areas in the lunar highlands. We propose that this trend is supportive of formation by shallow magmatic intrusion and sill formation—crustal thickness determines the magnitude of magmatic driving pressure, and thus either piston‐like floor uplift for high magnitude, or a convex floor profile for low magnitude. Predictions from previous studies modeling viscous relaxation are inconsistent with the observed altimetric profiles of FFCs. Hence our analysis favors FFC formation by shallow magmatic intrusion, with the variety of FFC morphologies being intimately linked with location and crustal thickness, and the driving pressure of the intrusion. Data from the GRAIL (Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory) mission will help to test these conclusions.