
Upper crustal structure of Newberry Volcano from P‐wave tomography and finite difference waveform modeling
Author(s) -
Beachly Matthew W.,
Hooft Emilie E. E.,
Toomey Douglas R.,
Waite Gregory P.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2012jb009458
Subject(s) - geology , caldera , magma chamber , sill , magma , amplitude , seismology , volcano , waveform , tomography , seismic tomography , geophysics , p wave , petrology , physics , mantle (geology) , optics , medicine , voltage , quantum mechanics , cardiology , atrial fibrillation
Seismic tomography combined with waveform modeling constrains the dimensions and melt content of a magma body in the upper crust at Newberry Volcano. We obtain a P ‐wave tomographic image by combining travel‐time data collected in 2008 on a line of densely spaced seismometers with active‐source data collected in the 1980s. The tomographic analysis resolves a high‐velocity intrusive ring complex surrounding a low‐velocity caldera‐fill zone at depths above 3 km and a broader high‐velocity intrusive complex surrounding a central low‐velocity anomaly at greater depths (3–6 km). This second, upper‐crustal low‐velocity anomaly is poorly resolved and resolution tests indicate that an unrealistically large, low‐velocity body representing ∼60 km 3 of melt could be consistent with the available travel times. The 2008 data exhibit low amplitude first arrivals and an anomalous secondary P wave phase originating beneath the caldera. Two‐dimensional finite difference waveform modeling through the tomographic velocity model does not reproduce these observations. To reproduce these phases, we predict waveforms for models that include synthetic low‐velocity bodies and test possible magma chamber geometries and properties. Three classes of models produce a transmitted P ‐phase consistent with the travel time and amplitude of the observed secondary phase and also match the observed lower amplitude first arrivals. These models represent a graded mush region, a crystal‐suspension region, and a melt sill above a thin mush region. The three possible magma chamber models comprise a much narrower range of melt volumes (1.6–8.0 km 3 ) than could be constrained by travel‐time tomography alone.