z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
High‐fidelity paleointensity determination from historic volcanoes in Japan
Author(s) -
Yu Yongjae
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2012jb009368
Subject(s) - earth's magnetic field , geology , volcano , seismology , secular variation , andesite , geophysics , magnetic field , volcanic rock , physics , quantum mechanics
Providing high‐fidelity paleointensity estimates is pivotal to identify temporal fluctuation of ancient geomagnetic field. Despite abundance of available paleointensity data in Japan, only dozen of them satisfy modern standards with systematic alteration checks. High‐fidelity paleointensity estimates were obtained from historic andesitic lavas collected from Mt. Aso (Ojodake, ≈700 BC), Mt. Kirishima (Iwoyama, AD 1768; Ohachi, AD 1235), and Mt. Sakurajima (An‐ei, AD 1779; Nabeyama, AD 764–766). Variation of geomagnetic field intensity is distinctively different from the prediction of global models (ARCH3k.1, CALS3k.3, CALS3k.4, CALS7k.2, and CALS10k.1b) for the past 4000 years in Japan. The compilation of high‐fidelity Thellier data set in Japan showed two obvious high intensities at AD 590–765 and AD 1330–1435 and one low intensity at ≈700 BC. These time intervals with anomalous high/low intensities are nearly identical to three of the four potential archeomagnetic jerks recognized from the European archeomagnetic data, implying that the archeomagnetic jerks were global (or at least northern hemispheric) features. To improve the poor representation of regional geomagnetic field variation with respect to the global model prediction, more high‐fidelity paleointensity determinations are required in East Asia.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here