z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
On near‐tail bubble penetration into geosynchronous altitude
Author(s) -
Kim H.S.,
Lee D.Y.,
Ohtani S.,
Park M.Y.,
Ahn B.H.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2012ja017749
Subject(s) - bubble , geosynchronous orbit , physics , mechanics , flux (metallurgy) , geophysics , astronomy , materials science , satellite , metallurgy
Dipolarization of the magnetic field at the near‐Earth tail is usually associated with the local reduction of pV 5/3 compared to that of the background, where p is the plasma pressure and V is the volume of the unit magnetic flux tube. This can be interpreted as a bubble, which can propagate earthward by the interchange process. How deep such a bubble can penetrate earthward, and what is the critical factor are critical questions that need to be answered. In this paper, we examine these issues by comparing near‐tail observations by inner probes of THEMIS with geosynchronous magnetic observations by GOES. We identified a number of bubble events associated with near‐tail dipolarization, which we call “tail bubble,” and checked geosynchronous disturbances. We find a statistical trend that geosynchronous disturbance is more likely to occur when associated with (or when hit by) an earthward moving tail bubble with a more‐depleted pV 5/3 . We estimated the background pV 5/3 profile statistically and used it to determine expected equilibrium (or stop) positions for earthward moving bubbles where the bubble's pV 5/3 is equal to that of the background. Statistically, we find that the equilibrium position is more inward for tail bubbles with a lower pV 5/3 , for which the probability of causing geosynchronous disturbance is higher. For example, the probability of a tail bubble being associated with geosynchronous disturbance is 75% if the bubble's equilibrium position is <8 R E . However, for all the events studied here, the bubble equilibrium positions are still outside the geosynchronous altitude. Although this result may be subject to change due to the uncertainty in estimating pV 5/3 and the limited number of the events identified near geosynchronous altitude, we suggest that an overshooting of the penetrating bubbles beyond equilibrium positions is a possible explanation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here