
Experimental assessment of the purity of α ‐cellulose produced by variations of the Brendel method: Implications for stable isotope ( δ 13 C, δ 18 O) dendroclimatology
Author(s) -
Brookman Tom,
Whittaker Thomas
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.928
H-Index - 136
ISSN - 1525-2027
DOI - 10.1029/2012gc004215
Subject(s) - cellulose , stable isotope ratio , isotope analysis , isotope , extraction (chemistry) , fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , reagent , analytical chemistry (journal) , geology , mineralogy , chemistry , environmental science , environmental chemistry , chromatography , physics , oceanography , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
Stable isotope dendroclimatology using α ‐cellulose has unique potential to deliver multimillennial‐scale, sub‐annually resolved, terrestrial climate records. However, lengthy processing and analytical methods often preclude such reconstructions. Variants of the Brendel extraction method have reduced these limitations, providing fast, easy methods of isolating α ‐cellulose in some species. Here, we investigate application of Standard Brendel (SBrendel) variants to resinous soft‐woods by treating samples of kauri ( Agathis australis ), ponderosa pine ( Pinus ponderosa ) and huon pine ( Lagarastrobus franklinii ), varying reaction vessel, temperature, boiling time and reagent volume. Numerous samples were visibly ‘under‐processed’ and Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopic (FTIR) investigation showed absorption peaks at 1520 cm −1 and ∼1600 cm −1 in those fibers suggesting residual lignin and retained resin respectively. Replicate analyses of all samples processed at high temperature yielded consistent δ 13 C and δ 18 O despite color and spectral variations. Spectra and isotopic data revealed that α ‐cellulose δ 13 C can be altered during processing, most likely due to chemical contamination from insufficient acetone removal, but is not systematically affected by methodological variation. Reagent amount, temperature and extraction time all influence δ 18 O, however, and our results demonstrate that different species may require different processing methods. FTIR prior to isotopic analysis is a fast and cost effective way to determine α ‐cellulose extract purity. Furthermore, a systematic isotopic test such as we present here can also determine sensitivity of isotopic values to methodological variables. Without these tests, isotopic variability introduced by the method could obscure or ‘create’ climatic signals within a data set.