Open AccessAn assessment of geochemical preparation methods prior to organic carbon concentration and carbon isotope ratio analyses of fine‐grained sedimentary rocks
Author(s) -
Könitzer Sven F.,
Leng Melanie J.,
Davies Sarah J.,
Stephenson Michael H.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.928
H-Index - 136
ISSN - 1525-2027
DOI - 10.1029/2012gc004094
Subject(s) - carbonate , geology , total organic carbon , isotopes of carbon , fractionation , carbonate minerals , sedimentary rock , carbon fibers , mineralogy , isotope analysis , environmental chemistry , geochemistry , chemistry , calcite , materials science , organic chemistry , composite material , composite number , oceanography
This study summarizes organic carbon isotope ( δ 13 C) and total organic carbon (TOC) data from a series of tests undertaken to provide an appropriate methodology for pre‐analysis treatment of mudstones from an Upper Carboniferous sedimentary succession, in order to develop a consistent preparation procedure. The main treatments involved removing both inorganic carbonate and hydrocarbons (which might be extraneous) before δ 13 C and TOC analysis. The results show that decarbonating using hydrochloric acid causes significant reduction in δ 13 C and total carbon (TC) of the bulk material due to the removal of inorganic carbonate. These changes are most pronounced where soluble calcium carbonate (rather than Ca‐Mg‐Fe carbonate) is present. Deoiled samples show only slightly higher mean δ 13 C where visible bitumen was extracted from the bulk sample. Moreover, the isotopic signatures of the extracts are closely correlated to those of their respective bulk samples, suggesting that small yields of hydrocarbons were generated in situ with no isotopic fractionation. In addition, further δ 13 C and TC analyses were performed on samples where mixing of oil‐based drilling mud with brecciated core material had been undertaken. Brecciated mudstone material did not display distinct isotopic signals compared to the surrounding fine‐grained material. Overall we show that the most accurate assessment of bulk organic carbon isotopes and concentration in these samples can be achieved through decarbonating the material prior to measurement via the ‘rinse method’. However, our results support recent findings that pre‐analysis acid treatments can cause variable and unpredictable errors in δ 13 C and TOC values. We believe that, despite these uncertainties, the findings presented here can be applied to paleoenvironmental studies on organic matter contained within sedimentary rocks over a range of geological ages and compositions.