Premium
The effects of CO 2 ‐brine rheology on leakage processes in geologic carbon sequestration
Author(s) -
Wang Shibo,
Clarens Andres F.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/2011wr011220
Subject(s) - rheology , brine , buoyancy , thixotropy , halite , ionic strength , viscosity , materials science , thermodynamics , mineralogy , geology , geotechnical engineering , petroleum engineering , chemistry , composite material , aqueous solution , physics , gypsum
Leakage from geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) sites is inherently challenging to study because CO 2 , driven by buoyant forces, travels over long distances, undergoing phase changes and encountering numerous connate brine and formation chemistries as it rises to the surface. This work explores the effect that CO 2 has on the rheological properties of brine solutions over a range of GCS‐relevant temperature, pressure, ionic strength, and shear conditions. Under the fluid‐liquid equilibrium conditions that prevail in the deep subsurface, viscosity of CO 2 ‐brine mixtures was found to be a function of temperature and pressure alone. Once leakage conditions ensue, discrete CO 2 bubbles form in brine, resulting in the vapor‐liquid equilibrium (VLE), and these mixtures exhibit complex linear viscoelastic, time dependent, and thixotropic behavior. The presence of CO 2(g) bubbles on the flow of the bulk fluid could have important impacts on impeding (via shear drag force) leakage depending on the geometrical, geochemical and geophysical characteristics of a storage site. Under VLE conditions, the effective viscosity of CO 2 ‐brine mixtures was found to be up to five times higher than brine alone but the microstructure was easily destroyed, and not readily regained, under high shear conditions. At higher temperatures and higher ionic strength, the effect is less pronounced. These results were considered in the context of flow through porous media, and the effect on buoyancy‐driven flow is significant. Understanding this effect is important for developing an accurate constitutive relationship for leaking CO 2 , which will lead to better capacity to select and monitor GCS sites.