Open Access
Aerosol formation in basaltic lava fountaining: Eyjafjallajökull volcano, Iceland
Author(s) -
Ilyinskaya Evgenia,
Martin Robert S.,
Oppenheimer Clive
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2011jd016811
Subject(s) - aerosol , lava , scoria , plume , volcano , sulfate , basalt , sulfate aerosol , volcanic gases , particulates , atmospheric sciences , environmental chemistry , mineralogy , geology , environmental science , geochemistry , chemistry , meteorology , physics , organic chemistry
A short‐lived episode of basaltic lava fountaining at Eyjafjallajökull volcano (March – April 2010) produced a low‐altitude, ash‐poor plume. We measured the composition of aerosol particles (sampled using a cascade impactor and filter packs), gases (sampled using filter packs), and volatile species scavenged by scoria and external water in order to investigate the formation and speciation of near‐source aerosol (<2 min from emission). Samples were analyzed for volatile species (S, Cl and F) and metals (Na, K, Ca and Mg). The aerosol mass showed two unusual features: the prevalent size mode was finer than typically found in volcanic plumes (∼0.2 μ m, compared to >0.4 μ m), and its composition was dominated by chloride rather than sulfate. We used two thermodynamic equilibrium models (E‐AIM and HSC Chemistry v5.1) to show that the formation of particulate Cl − by condensation of HCl gas is more responsive to changes in ambient temperature than the oxidation of SO 2 to SO 4 2− , so that a low SO 4 2− /Cl − ratio in aerosol particles is characteristic of volcanic emissions in cold climates. Field measurements suggested that the efficiency of SO 2 to SO 4 2− conversion inside the vent increased with lower explosivity. Volatiles adsorbed on the surface of scoria had significantly higher SO 4 2− /halogen molar ratios than the aerosol samples. Several potential explanations for these differences are discussed.