Tide model accuracy in the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica, from radar interferometry observations of ice shelf motion
Author(s) -
McMillan M.,
Shepherd A.,
Nienow P.,
Leeson A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2011jc007294
Subject(s) - geology , tidal model , geodesy , interferometric synthetic aperture radar , satellite , ice shelf , displacement (psychology) , sea ice , radar , oceanography , synthetic aperture radar , climatology , remote sensing , cryosphere , physics , psychology , telecommunications , astronomy , computer science , psychotherapist
This study assesses the accuracy of tide model predictions in the Amundsen Sea sector of West Antarctica. Tide model accuracy in this region is poorly constrained, yet tide models contribute to simulations of ocean heat transfer and to the removal of tidal signals from satellite observations of ice shelves. We use two satellite‐based interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) methods to measure the tidal motion of the Dotson Ice Shelf at multiple epochs: a single‐difference technique that measures tidal displacement and a double‐difference technique that measures changes in tidal displacement. We use these observations to evaluate predictions from three tide models (TPXO7.1, CATS2008a_opt, and FES2004). All three models perform comparably well, exhibiting root‐mean‐square deviations from the observations of ∼9 cm (single‐difference technique) and ∼10 cm (double‐difference technique). Care should be taken in generalizing these error statistics because (1) the Dotson Ice Shelf experiences relatively small semidiurnal tides and (2) our observations are not sensitive to all tidal constituents. An error analysis of our InSAR‐based methods indicates measurement errors of 7 and 4 cm for the single‐ and double‐difference techniques, respectively. A model‐based correction for the effect of fluctuations in atmospheric pressure yields an ∼6% improvement in the agreement between tide model predictions and observations. This study suggests that tide model accuracy in the Amundsen Sea is comparable to other Antarctic regions where tide models are better constrained. These methods can be used to evaluate tide models in other remote Antarctic waters.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom