Open AccessComplex fluid flow revealed by monitoring CO 2 injection in a fluvial formation
Author(s) -
Lu Jiemin,
Cook Paul J.,
Hosseini Seyyed A.,
Yang Changbing,
Romanak Katherine D.,
Zhang Tongwei,
Freifeld Barry M.,
Smyth Rebecca C.,
Zeng Hongliu,
Hovorka Susan D.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2011jb008939
Subject(s) - fluvial , geology , flow (mathematics) , geomorphology , geophysics , mechanics , physics , structural basin
At Cranfield, Mississippi, United States, a large‐scale carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) injection through an injection well (∼3,080 m deep) was continuously monitored using U‐tube samplers in two observation wells located 68 and 112 m east of the injector. The Lower Tuscaloosa Formation injection zone, which consists of amalgamated fluvial point‐bar and channel‐fill deposits, presents an interesting environment for studying fluid flow in heterogeneous formations. Continual fluid sampling was carried out during the first month of CO 2 injection. Two subsequent tracer tests using sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) and krypton were conducted at different injection rates to measure flow velocity change. The field observations showed significant heterogeneity of fluid flow and for the first time clearly demonstrated that fluid flow evolved with time and injection rate. It was found the wells were connected through numerous, separate flow pathways. CO 2 flowed through an increasing fraction of the reservoir and sweep efficiency improved with time. The field study also first documented in situ component exchange between brine and gas phases during CO 2 injection. It was found that CH 4 degassed from brine and is enriched along the gas–water contact. Multiple injectate flow fronts with high CH 4 concentration arrived at different times and led to gas composition fluctuations in the observation wells. The findings provide valuable insights into heterogeneous multiphase flow in rock formations and show that conventional geological models and static fluid flow simulations are unable to fully describe the heterogeneous and dynamic flow during fluid injection.